The same skill could have dealt you a very different curve — better or worse. Yours is one roll of the dice, not the verdict.
Your equity curve is a single sample drawn from your edge’s true distribution — one path out of thousands the exact same skill could have produced. Redraw those same trades and the curve moves, sometimes a lot: a strong finish becomes a mediocre one, a shallow dip becomes a brutal one. Nothing about your skill changed; only which outcomes landed, and in which order. A green run is not proof the edge is real, and a red run is not proof it is broken. Both are variance until the sample is large enough to speak.
Luck enters through two doors. The first is which outcomes you drew: over a small sample the same win rate and payoff can finish deep in the green or deep in the red purely by chance. The second is the order they arrived in: even the identical set of trades, reshuffled, can stack its losers early and dig a drawdown deep enough to end the account before the edge ever pays. The first door swings your finish; the second swings your worst dip. Your real curve got one draw through each — and you cannot separate luck from skill by staring at it.
Do not over-update on one curve. Grow the sample before you trust the number — thirty trades is a floor, not a verdict — and watch the direction of your expectancy more than any single run. Then size for the unlucky paths, not the one you happened to get: if a normal reshuffle of your own trades could have ruined you, you are betting too big. The Simulator does exactly this — it redraws and reorders your real trades so the spread the naked curve hides becomes visible.
Reading about R is the easy part. The journal makes you keep the stats — grade the setup before you know how it ends, and hear the one thing to fix next.
Start alpha test